a certain Diego Armando Maradona.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Imagenes De Gonorrhea
I wonder how far I can be impartial and objective (as he likes to Sen ) with respect to certain matters that I get to the depths of the soul. Because I have a feeling (and talk about me because this is my blog, but more importantly because this is precisely what may invalidate the reasoning that we try to outline) absurd to sporting issues: talk about the world that are a dagger in the heart and at the time, River Plate.
How should you play soccer? It's something they really do not know today, but argued for a long time a scheme (a sort of Neo-Bilardo to the British once explained in the past) which identified 2008-2009 for Liverpool and Barcelona 2008-2009, and is not for today has started a round of questions about the ways / methods more efficient, but what I've been thinking for some time now. And I do not know. And Mourinho? Is he right? Or how important is the role of technical director?
'm a fan of football as a aesthetics (which pregonarÃa Angelito prioritizing the show over the result), but I'm not sure if aesthetics can be compatible with the result, or if they are mutually exclusive. I want to win River, I want to win to Argentina and I do not care how and then it was to find which is the way that leads to the result and here we have an agreement: aesthetics without result not good, but how to play "aesthetic" does not inevitably lead to the result?
When we see a Spain-Switzerland appears to be a satisfaction for school failure Valdano, which claims to prophesy a radically different football played in the world. The doom-sayers against this doctrine, says that if the remaining 18 teams were playing zero priority, the Barcelona-Real Madrid would fare a lot worse.
But when we see a Spain-Paraguay / Portugal those same soothsayers disappear and new ones appear to say that's how football, in its mathematical expectation, eventually triumphed. Here we see touch, dynamics, movement of the lines in the block, "jogo-bonito" will say: But it says? Is Spain / Holland model?
Or is Germany, although not quite understand this game as (apparently) efficient? Argentina
Any elimination hurts, it kills me. But we see something: Argentina was higher and played very well until the second half against Mexico. From then on, it left much space (a game and a half) so that things can go wrong and that's what happened. Llach would say: the world are chosen as missing, and here we chose the worst way, without having the ball (and so we went). Because the lack of coordination between the leaflets and the defense was always, but today it did not work our comparative advantage are the front, and that happens, that one day duties. Lio What were going to get the ball into the area practically? Higuain What were defending in the second (or third) goal? The middle! The middle! We lost the midfield for quite a while and so we went. Nothing too terrible or anything reprehensible, but enough to stay out. And it was 4-4-2, 3-5-2, 3-2-2-2 ?????
What would have happened if, between the first goal and the second in one of many attack a few clear, the ball went? Situation at all unlikely. The story would be another, probably. There will be time to try to give some answers to these questions, maybe if arm / game plan to try some (of my choice, I'd like a European model to test.) That's all folks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment