already has the world and this blog, if anything, will become more futbolero ("even more?). No time for questions of economic, philosophical or literary. The most important event in history is here in our noses and we intend to tackle it with everything. Nuances of football with other issues (for example, what is the racial situation in South Africa and its income distribution) are being addressed successfully by The Economist (and I find the appropriate link.) Let the ideas a little clearer. The world
of 82 was not born, at 86 was three: I do not remember anything. And in the 90's when the story starts. When it was 94 long my first (and thereafter in a row) chubby crying when I take the genius of world football's reach. Of 98 remember seeing in my bed teenager on a Saturday morning when he escaped Dick Ayala-Kamp. From 2002
better not to talk: from illusion to disillusionment in an instant. Veron still remember putting calm in a situation not warranted. Disgusted with the economic and social situation of the country, started my first year economics again with the illusion broken.
And I get 2006, Germany, and the story. Another cry more and this damn blog was in its infancy. Reluctantly accepted the tessitura of Lucas Llach: The world must choose them as losing, and not win, which is very difficult.
But making use of intuitionism Keynesian immediacy tells me
1) We will be champions.
2) England will have an excellent global as well as Brazil, and
3) Spain is the great failure.
Maradona was almost as good as Messi, and the formula gives me two geniuses in the same project is a guarantee of absolute success. Should we try? Perhaps, but no idea how. Do I futurology? None of that, there are no algorithms or information markets making predictions. The front of the computer are almost all in the prime of their careers also feeds the suspicion me up. If I could say the same for the defense, signed a promissory note to which we return. That's all for now.
0 comments:
Post a Comment